“Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds”: Universal Music hits back in Drake defamation case
Record company argues that Drake’s action “disregards the conventions of the diss track genre”

Universal Music has made moves to dismiss the defamation suit Drake took out against it, describing it as “a misguided attempt” by the Canadian rapper to “salve his wounds” after he was viewed to have “lost a rap battle” with Kendrick Lamar.
In the motion, filed in a New York district court, Universal - which represents both Drake and Lamar - claimed that Drake “lost a rap battle that he provoked and in which he willingly participated.
“Instead of accepting the loss like the unbothered rap artist he often claims to be, he has sued his own record label in a misguided attempt to salve his wounds. Plaintiff’s complaint is utterly without merit and should be dismissed with prejudice.”
It’s coming up to a year since Drake and Lamar first began trading diss tracks on what initially seemed like a daily basis. But the immense success of Lamar’s Not Like Us - breaking Spotify records, winning Grammys and becoming a global talking point - has proved unanswerable.
Instead, Drake decided to file a lawsuit against Universal, claiming that it “approved, published and launched a campaign to create a viral hit out of a rap track” that was “intended to convey the specific, unmistakable, and false factual allegation that Drake is a criminal pedophile, and to suggest that the public should resort to vigilante justice in response.”
Universal, in the motion to dismiss the case, argues that Not Like Us “conveys non-actionable opinion and rhetorical hyperbole, not fact.” It also points out that Universal has promoted Drake’s own diss tracks against Lamar, and indeed other rappers.
Drake’s action, it argues “disregards the other Drake and Lamar diss tracks that surrounded Not Like Us as well as the conventions of the diss track genre… diss tracks are a popular and celebrated artform centred around outrageous insults, and they would be severely chilled if Drake’s suit were permitted to proceed.”
Get the MusicRadar Newsletter
Want all the hottest music and gear news, reviews, deals, features and more, direct to your inbox? Sign up here.
The Canadian rapper doesn’t appear to giving up, though. In a statement released to Variety, his attorney Michael J. Gottlieb responded by saying: “UMG (Universal) wants to pretend that this is about a rap battle in order to distract its shareholders, artists and the public from a simple truth: a greedy company is finally being held responsible for profiting from dangerous misinformation that has already resulted in multiple acts of violence.”
It’s hard to see what Drake stands to gain by pursuing the case. Any victory, in the unlikely event that it ever comes to court, will surely be pyrrhic. As ever, the only winners will be the lawyers.
Will Simpson is a freelance music expert whose work has appeared in Classic Rock, Classic Pop, Guitarist and Total Guitar magazine. He is the author of 'Freedom Through Football: Inside Britain's Most Intrepid Sports Club' and his second book 'An American Cricket Odyssey' is due out in 2025
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

“It showcases a straightforward single-channel layout ideal for both clean tones and mild breakup tones”: Revv Amplification and Joey Landreth join forces for a signature take on the D25 tube combo with onboard virtual cabs/IRs

“That’s how I know that I’ve written a good song for myself - when I start crying”: How Adele's songwriting cleverly grabs our emotions